Eliteserien (Norway) standings
Table calculated from 200 league results this season (2026), with Skorbot's projection for the rest of the season.
Standings
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viking | 25 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 64 | 26 | +38 | 59 | WWWWL |
| 2 | Bodo/Glimt | 25 | 19 | 2 | 4 | 61 | 23 | +38 | 59 | LWWLW |
| 3 | Molde | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 59 | 39 | +20 | 43 | LDWWL |
| 4 | Rosenborg | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 49 | 31 | +18 | 43 | WDWWW |
| 5 | Lillestrøm | 25 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 36 | 33 | +3 | 42 | LDWWW |
| 6 | Tromso | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 43 | 38 | +5 | 40 | WDDLL |
| 7 | Brann | 25 | 10 | 2 | 13 | 45 | 42 | +3 | 32 | WLLLW |
| 8 | Valerenga | 25 | 9 | 5 | 11 | 43 | 46 | -3 | 32 | DLWWW |
| 9 | Sarpsborg 08 | 25 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 32 | 39 | -7 | 31 | LWLWL |
| 10 | KFUM Oslo | 25 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 32 | 41 | -9 | 31 | WWDDD |
| 11 | Fredrikstad | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 29 | 44 | -15 | 29 | DDLLL |
| 12 | Sandefjord | 25 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 26 | 34 | -8 | 27 | WDLLW |
| 13 | HamKam | 25 | 7 | 6 | 12 | 35 | 53 | -18 | 27 | LWLLD |
| 14 | Aalesund | 25 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 43 | 57 | -14 | 24 | WLWLL |
| 15 | Kristiansund | 25 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 29 | 51 | -22 | 23 | LLLDW |
| 16 | Start | 25 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 26 | 55 | -29 | 19 | LLLWL |
Calculated from match results. Point deductions and official tie-break rules are not applied, so positions can differ from the official table.
Season projection
Skorbot's model played the remaining 40 matches 10,000 times. The table shows how often each team finished in each zone.
| Team | Average final points | 1st | Top 4 | Bottom 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bodo/Glimt | 69.8 | 51% | 100% | – |
| Viking | 69.6 | 49% | 100% | – |
| Rosenborg | 52.6 | – | 86% | – |
| Lillestrøm | 49.9 | – | 50% | – |
| Molde | 49.4 | – | 49% | – |
| Tromso | 46.8 | – | 15% | – |
| Brann | 40.6 | – | <1% | <1% |
| Valerenga | 38.5 | – | <1% | <1% |
| Sarpsborg 08 | 37.0 | – | – | 1% |
| KFUM Oslo | 35.5 | – | – | 2% |
| Fredrikstad | 35.5 | – | – | 5% |
| Sandefjord | 34.5 | – | – | 7% |
| HamKam | 32.8 | – | – | 21% |
| Kristiansund | 28.6 | – | – | 82% |
| Aalesund | 28.3 | – | – | 82% |
| Start | 23.2 | – | – | 100% |
Each remaining match is simulated from the teams' strength ratings. A projection, not a guarantee.